- LittleLaw
- Posts
- šļø The court ruling that could save River Island
šļø The court ruling that could save River Island

Together with
Table of Contents
If you take just one thing from this email...
Restructuring plans are now a lifeline for struggling companies. A restructuring plan is a legal deal with creditors that lets a company cut debts or get more time to pay, instead of collapsing into insolvency.
The High Court approved River Islandās plan even though its landlords opposed it, because the landlords would still get more under the plan than if the business failed. This shows how UK law now prioritises saving companies while still giving creditors some protection.

EDITORāS RAMBLE š£
Last week, I was in Chicago and decided to put this message on LinkedIn šļø
I didnāt expect much from it (most of my LinkedIn connections are in the UK).
But then I got this DM:

So, I ended up meeting with Lucas ā and we had a super long, interesting chat while on the Chicago Riverwalk.

Hereās my take-away: If youāve got a free morning, Iād 100% suggest posting a message like this ā you donāt know what connections it can spring up.
Plus, Iāll be doing this again at some point (follow me on LinkedIn if you want to see when).
ā Idin

FEATURED REPORT š°
šļø The court ruling that could save River Island

Whatās going on here?
River Island, a fashion retailer, got permission from the High Court to go ahead with a restructuring plan. The company had warned in June that if the plan wasnāt approved, it would run out of money by the end of August. That would mean it couldnāt pay its debts on time and would be considered insolvent.
What is a restructuring plan?
Restructuring plans are a tool in UK law that help struggling companies to keep trading. They were created by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA), which came in during the pandemic to help support struggling businesses.
Before this law, if a company couldnāt repay its debts, it had no real option but to fail. The Act changed that. Now, a company in financial trouble ā but not yet insolvent ā can make a formal deal with its creditors to restructure its debts.
Itās a bit like a homeowner renegotiating their mortgage before they miss a payment. Instead of the bank repossessing the house, the borrower and lender agree new terms ā like extending the repayment period or changing instalments ā so the borrower can stay afloat and eventually repay whatās owed.
š¦ What is a creditor?
A creditor is anyone a company owes money to.
For River Island, this could include suppliers who sell it clothes, landlords who rent it store space, and banks that have lent it money.
A restructuring plan can include things like:
giving the company more time to repay its debts
lowering the interest rate on those debts
reducing the total amount owed (sometimes with creditors getting extra security over the companyās assets in return)
Because these changes directly affect what creditors are entitled to, they wonāt all agree. Some creditors may feel theyāre losing out compared to others. Thatās why the plan can end up needing approval of the court. The court steps in to make sure the deal is fair overall.
Why is River Island struggling?
In 2024-2025, River Islandās revenue fell by 15%, leaving it with a Ā£32 million loss. This meant it wasnāt earning enough to pay back its debts, which is why it asked its creditors to approve a restructuring plan.
The drop in revenue was because of a few different things.
āļø Unclear brand identity: River Island is seen as stuck in the middle ā not cheap enough to compete with Primark, but not premium enough to rival M&S or Next. Analysts also describe its products and stores as stale.
š¢ Slow to adapt to trends: The company is owned by the Lewis family, who are reluctant to move away from their long-standing āaffordable family fashionā identity. This has made it slower to change with consumer preferences.
š° Higher operating costs: Since April 2025, employersā national insurance contributions have increased. Companies must now pay for staff earning over Ā£5,000 (down from Ā£9,100) and at a higher rate of 15% (up from 13.8%). This has made staffing more expensive.
š± Stronger online competition: Fast fashion giants like Shein and Temu operate only online, avoiding store costs. This lets them offer cheaper prices than traditional retailers.
What was included in River Islandās restructuring plan?
River Islandās plan focused on cutting costs and reshaping its business.
ā Closing stores: 33 of its 230 shops will shut, as more customers now prefer shopping online.
ā Lower rents: For 71 locations, landlords will cut rent by 25% to 100% (weāll explain how later).
ā Job cuts: 110 staff members will be made redundant.
ā New funding: The Lewis familyās investment firm, Blue Coast Capital, will inject Ā£40 million into the business to improve River Islandās in-person shopping experience.
How was River Islandās restructuring plan approved?
Before a company can push through a restructuring plan, it needs the backing of its shareholders (the people who own the company) and its creditors (the people it owes money to).
Normally, shareholders and creditors are split into groups, called classes. Shareholders are grouped by the type of shares they own, and creditors are grouped by the kind of debt the company owes them.
For a restructuring plan to pass, at least 75% of each class (measured by the value of shares or debt) must vote in favour.
In River Islandās case, its landlords made up one of the creditor classes. They were asked to approve big rent cuts, in some cases up to 100% for several years. Unsurprisingly, many landlords rejected this and the class didnāt meet the 75% approval threshold.
Because of this, the plan was passed to the High Court for review. The court then had the power to approve it despite landlord opposition.
So why was River Islandās plan approved?
The court can approve a plan even if one class votes against it, but only if that class would not be worse off under the plan than they would be if the company went insolvent.
For River Islandās landlords, this test was met: they will get less rent under the plan, but if River Island became insolvent and shut all its stores, they would get nothing at all. In other words, the restructuring plan leaves them better off than the alternative.
Which law firms were involved?
River Island was advised by Greenberg Traurig, a US law firm with a London office that specialises in restructuring and insolvency.
The creditors didnāt share one legal adviser. However, one major landlord, British Land, was represented by Hogan Lovells. Hogan Lovells is also advising British Land on Poundlandās restructuring plan which also includes rent reductions.
How can you use this in your applications?
You can learn a lot from River Islandās restructuring plan that could help you in your applications ā it really shows how insolvency laws work in practice:
Insight | Explanation | When to use it |
---|---|---|
CIGA gives companies a new lifeline | Before 2020, UK insolvency law focused on winding companies up to protect creditors. The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act (CIGA) introduced restructuring plans, allowing struggling companies to keep trading. | In a case study or interview about a business in trouble, mention restructuring plans as an option alongside cost-cutting and profit-boosting measures. Itāll show you understand that debt and rent can be restructured to help a company avoid insolvency. |
Precedent set for landlords | The court approved River Islandās plan even though landlords opposed it, forcing them to accept lower rents. This shows courts are willing to prioritise company survival over strict landlord rights. | If asked to discuss a commercial news story, you can use River Island as an example. Highlight the tension: good for companies staying afloat, bad for landlords losing income. Then link it to opportunities for real estate teams to help landlords reduce risk, like doing stricter tenant due diligence to prevent it getting to this stage. |
Knock-on effects for property values and lending | When rents go down, commercial properties are worth less. This can cause problems for landlords who have loans tied to the value of their buildings. If the value falls too much, they might break the rules of their loan agreements, which can lead to extra costs or even the bank demanding repayment. | You can use this to show that a single restructuring plan affects many areas at once ā retail, real estate, and finance. |
Highlighting insights like these will show youāre thinking like a lawyer: spotting where the risk is, whoās involved, and how the law creates structure that lets deals happen.
If you can spot insights like these in your application (and link the legal and business impacts) youāll show law firms that you can think like a commercial adviser ā exactly what top firms want to see.

TOGETHER WITH BARBRI SQE* š¤
The next 120 seconds could be your first step towards becoming a solicitor
Complete this short quiz from BARBRI to have the chance to win a fully-funded SQE Prep course worth £3,299.
On top of that, youāll walk away with clear, personalised next steps to kickstart your legal career ā plus you could win prizes along the way.
Hereās what you get (for free):
A chance to win a full SQE Prep course from BARBRI (Ā£3,299)
Tailored guidance on what to do next in your career
Insider tips and resources from legal experts
Extra prizes just for taking part
Be quick ā entries close this Friday (22 August).
So, donāt waste your summer guessing what to do next.
* This is sponsored content

IN OTHER NEWS š
š¼ Lewis Silkin had a big year, with revenue jumping 19% (to Ā£119 million) and profit up 30% (to Ā£41 million). The growth comes from its push into northern cities like Manchester, Leeds and now Glasgow, adding to its nine offices.
šØ Addleshaw Goddard and TLT advised on Card Factoryās Ā£24 million purchase of Funky Pigeon from WH Smith. The deal is part of WH Smithās shift away from old businesses to focus on travel retail ā it also sold 480 high street shops for Ā£76 million earlier this year. AG acted for Card Factory, while TLT represented WH Smith.
š Wikipedia lost its challenge of the Online Safety Act that could force it to verify usersā identities. The Wikimedia Foundation argued this would threaten the privacy and safety of volunteer editors, but the High Court rejected its case. The government welcomed the ruling, saying it helps create a safer online world.

AROUND THE WEB š
š² Game: Complete the definitions in this drag and drop word game
š¦ Sweet: A website shows a live map of broken McDonaldās ice cream machines
š¤ Robo: The first-ever World Humanoid Robot Games featured 500+ robots competing across 26 sports ā hereās a couple of them fighting šļø

STUFF THAT MIGHT HELP YOU š
š¹ļø Free application help: If you're applying to commercial law firms, check out my YouTube channel for actionable tips and an insight into the lifestyle of a commercial lawyer in London.
How did you find today's newsletter? |